Impact of the Guru Penggerak Programme on Improving Leadership Competence in Numeracy Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v19i1.3499Keywords:
Guru Penggerak, Competencies, Learning LeadershipAbstract
Education of Guru Penggerak is the Government's innovation to prepare for future leadership transformation. Before becoming a leader, the teacher mobiliser is required to be the main actor in classroom learning and mobilise peers through a community of practice. Thus, they are expected to become leaders in school management and development. Candidate of Guru Penggerak, after undergoing Education and Training for 6 months covering 10 modules, will become student-centred learning leaders. The implementation of quality student-centred learning has not been optimal and equitable from one region to another. The low level of literacy and numeracy in the education report card has led the Government to launch the Merdeka Belajar Programme. The purpose of the research conducted on prospective Guru Penggerak is to determine the impact of Education of Guru Penggerak on improving learning through improving grades during education and increasing competence in self-development and learning leadership, knowing the motivation of prospective Guru Penggerak after completing education and whether literacy and numeracy materials are needed. The research method uses quantitative descriptive research using data collection techniques of interviews, documentation, questionnaires and observations, pre-test-post test scores and questionnaires on prospective Guru Penggerak. The results obtained from this study are an average increase from the pre-test score of 50.80 to the average post-test score of 64.58 or an increase of 13.77. From the questionnaire, the competence of self-development and others increased from 76.82% to 87.35%. For learning leadership competence there was an increase from 73.03% to 85.04%
References
[1] M. Abduh, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Peserta Didik Melalui AKM (Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum),” Aug. 18, 2020.
[2] G. Pambudi, “Asesmen Nasional / Kompetensi Minimal (AKM),” Nov. 04, 2022. https://pusatdapodik.com/asesmen-nasional-kompetensi-minimal-akm/ (accessed May 25, 2023).
[3] Kemendikbudristek, “RAPOR PENDIDIKAN PUBLIK 2022 | Enhanced Reader,” Aug. 07, 2022. https://btikp.babelprov.go.id/sites/default/files/dokumen/bank_data/Rapor Pendidikan Paket C Tahun Ajaran 2021_2022.pdf (accessed May 25, 2023).
[4] Kemendikbud, “Sebagian Besar Kebijakan Kemendikbud ke Depan Terkait Guru,” Kemendikbud, Dec. 12, 2019. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/ blog/2019/12/sebagian-besar-kebijakan-kemendikbud-k e-depan-terkait-guru (accessed May 25, 2023).
[5] A. H. Hasanah, “PENGARUH PERANAN GURU PENGGERAK DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PROFIL PELAJAR PANCASILA DI SEKOLAH ,” Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 2022.
[6] F. Silvia Sofyan and A. Riswandi Sanusi, “PENTINGNYA WAJAR DIKDAS 12 TAHUN UNTUK MENYONGSONG INDONESIA EMAS TAHUN 2022,” in PROSIDING KONFERENSI NASIONAL PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN UNIVERSITAS BUANA PERJUANGAN KARAWANG, Apr. 2023, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2411–2420, Accessed: May 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://journal.ubpkarawang.ac.id/index.php/ProsidingKNPP/article/view/5218.
[7] S. Sardjoko, “PERENCANAAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA (SDM) DALAM RPJMN : MENUJU INDONESIA MAJU,” Mar. 10, 2020.
[8] Muliantara, I. K., & Suarni, N. K. (2022). Strategi Menguatkan Literasi dan Numerasi untuk Mendukung Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 4847–4855. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2847
[9] Gervasi, D., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Maley, J. (2022). Reciprocity in Organizational Behavior Studies: A Systematic Literature Review of Contents, Types, and Directions. European Management Journal, 40(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.008
[10] Van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenke, W. (2020). Fostering Collaborative Teacher Learning: A Typology of School Leadership. European Journal of Education, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12391
[11] Saleh, I. T., Muhidin, M., Zakiah, Qiqi Yuliati, Erihadiana, M., & Suhartini, A. (2021). Karakteristik, Proses Keputusan, Difusi, Diseminasi dan Strategi Inovasi Pendidikan. Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v4i1.453
[12] Schröer, A. (2021). Social Innovation in Education and Social Service Organizations. Challenges, Actors, and Approaches to Foster Social Innovation. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.555624
[13] Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020). Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620920576
[14] S. Revinah, “Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru dalam Empat Dekade Terakhir di Indonesia: Satu Langkah Maju, Dua Langkah Mundur” Nov. 4, 2020. https://rise.smeru.or.id/id/blog/pengembangan-profesionalisme-guru-dalam-empat-dekade-terakhir-di-indonesia-satu-langkah-maju diakses (accessed Mar. 5, 2023).
[15] Hamid H Lubis, S., Milfayetti, S., Lubis, M. J., & Purba, S. (2022). Peningkatan Sumber Daya Manusia Guru melalui Program Guru Penggerak.Jurnal Health Sains, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v3i6.441
[16] Urbani, C. (2020). Teacher Continuing Professional Development and Team Working Competences: A Case Study from Italy. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.2.6
[17] Faiz, A., & Faridah, F. (2022). Program Guru Penggerak Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v14i1.1876
[18] Kurniawaty, I., & Faiz, A. (2022). Konsep Dilema Etika dalam Pengambilan Keputusan: Tinjauan Pustaka dalam Modul Guru Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2961
[19] OECD. (2018). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-for-development-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264305274-en
[20] Kemendikbud. “Uji Kompetensi Guru (UKG) 2015” Nov. 4, 2015. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2015/11/uji-kompetensi-guru-ukg-2015-4800 (accessed Mar. 5, 2023).
[21] Riowati, R., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Peran Guru Penggerak pada Merdeka Belajar untuk Memperbaiki Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI) 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3393
[22] Puertas-Aguilar, M. Á., Álvarez-Otero, J., & de Lázaro-Torres, M. L. (2021). The challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381
[23] Sumaryanta., D. Mardapi., Sugiman., and T. Herawan. (2019). Community-Based Teacher Training: Transformation of Sustainable Teacher Empowerment Strategy in Indonesia. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0004
[24] Raagas, M. J. R. (2021). Alignment of School and Leadership Practices in Basic Education with Response-to-Intervention Model. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.144
[25] Istiqomah, I. (2022). The Perceptions of Pendidikan Guru Penggerak Towards Blended Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.717
[26] Garcia-Retamero, R., Sobkow, A., Petrova, D., Garrido, D., & Traczyk, J. (2019). Numeracy and Risk Literacy: What Have We Learned so Far? Spanish Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.16
[27] Ardiyan, L., Purba, S., Siburian, P., & Sinaga, O. (2022). Perbedaan Kreativitas Guru Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Adversity Quotient Dan Status Guru Penggerak. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v3i6.564
[28] Ardiyan, L. A., H Lubis, S. H., AB, R. A., Gultom, S. G., & Simaremare, A. S. (2022). Gambaran Kepemimpingan Pembelajaran Guru Penggerak. Syntax Idea, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v4i06.1871
[29] Mello, Jeffrey A. 2015. Human Recources Management Practice. USA: Cengage Learning.
[30] Nakidien, T., Sayed, Y., & Sadeck, O. (2022). Unpacking the Efficacy of a Continuous Professional Development Programme to Support Teachers to Use Assessment in No-Fee Schools. Journal of Education (South Africa), 87. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i87a03
[31] Nurwahidah, I., & Muhtar, T. (2022). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3113
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-10-01 (2)
- 2023-05-31 (1)
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Imron Imron, Amir Mahmud, Achmad Samsudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Media Eksakta agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
